Retrospective analysis of laparoscopic and open orchidopexy for non palpable intra-abdominal testes in a tertiary care centre

Purpose: Patients with non-palpable testes has numerous treatment options, the most effective treatment is still controversial. Laparoscopy has nowadays gained the trust as the most reliable modality for the management of impalpable testis. The aim of our study was to retrospectively analyse the lap...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Medical and Scientific Research 2024-04, Vol.12 (2), p.143-147
Hauptverfasser: MA, Thoker, M, Mushtaq, AH, Thoker, M, Ahmed, SA, Malik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Patients with non-palpable testes has numerous treatment options, the most effective treatment is still controversial. Laparoscopy has nowadays gained the trust as the most reliable modality for the management of impalpable testis. The aim of our study was to retrospectively analyse the laparoscopic and open orchidopexy procedures and report the outcome of our series. Material and methods: 120 patients with 130 non palpable testes with a mean age of patients about 2.7 years who had undergone orchidopexy by open and laparoscopic methods over past 8 years. Results: Mean age of open group was similar to laparoscopic group (2.7 ± 1.7 vs 2.5 ± 1.5 years; p > 0.05). 10 patients (8.33%) presented with bilateral non palpable testes. 10 testes from the open group and 8 from the laparoscopic group were of vanishing variety. Fowler -Stephens staged procedure was done for 4 testes in laparoscopic group. The mean operative time was more in the laparoscopic group than the open (63min vs 47min). Laparoscopic orchidopexy group had generally lesser use of analgesics. The mean hospital stay between the open and laparoscopic groups was 2.1 vs 1.3 days (p
ISSN:2321-1326
2394-112X
DOI:10.17727/JMSR.2024/12-27