109 Pair-wise differences of penumbra and core volume estimates from three computed tomography perfusion software packages are influenced by site of large vessel occlusion

ObjectivesComputed tomography perfusion (CTP) data are important for hyperacute stroke decision making. Comparisons between outputs of different CTP software packages are limited. We aimed to assess the pair-wise differences in infarct and penumbra estimates produced by three CTP software packages –...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ neurology open 2021-08, Vol.3 (Suppl 1), p.A39-A40
Hauptverfasser: Park, Peter SW, Chan, Robbie, Senanayake, Channa, Tsui, Stanley MK, Pope, Alun, Dewey, Helen M, Choi, Philip MC
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectivesComputed tomography perfusion (CTP) data are important for hyperacute stroke decision making. Comparisons between outputs of different CTP software packages are limited. We aimed to assess the pair-wise differences in infarct and penumbra estimates produced by three CTP software packages – MIStar, RAPID, and Vitrea.MethodsConsecutive patients with suspected acute ischaemic stroke who underwent CTP between July 2020 and June 2021 at our hospital were independently reviewed by two expert readers. Pair-wise differences between software estimates of penumbra and core volumes were calculated for each patient, with analysis stratified by large vessel occlusion (LVO) status (no-LVO, proximal M2, M1 and internal carotid artery-T [ICA-T]).Results580 CTP studies were performed; 262 were normal, 146 technically poor, with 172 included in the final analysis. 79/172 (45.9%) had LVO; proximal M2 (n=21), M1 (n=38) and ICA-T (n=20). Overall, statistically significant pair-wise differences were seen for both penumbra and core estimates (P
ISSN:2632-6140
DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2021-ANZAN.109