Comparison of percutaneous dilational tracheotomy using bronchoscope,ultrasound guidance and anatomical landmark
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy(PDT)using fiberoptic bronchoscope,ultrasound guidance and anatomic landmark localization. Methods In this retrospective cohort,101 patients undergoing PDT were enrolled and divided into bronchoscope-guided group(n =...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Xīn yīxué 2024-01, Vol.55 (1), p.63-68 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | chi |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy(PDT)using fiberoptic bronchoscope,ultrasound guidance and anatomic landmark localization. Methods In this retrospective cohort,101 patients undergoing PDT were enrolled and divided into bronchoscope-guided group(n = 39),ultrasound-guided group(n = 27),and anatomical landmark localization group(n = 35). Demographic data,general condition,surgical condition,postoperative complication and clinical prognosis were collected. Results No statistical significance was found in age,sex,cause of ICU stay,primary disease and preoperative coagulation status(all P > 0.05). In the ultrasound-guided group,preoperative Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA)score was higher,the operation time was shorter and intraoperative blood loss was less compared with those in the other two groups(P < 0.05/3). The PaCO2 in the anatomical landmark localization group was lower than that in the ultrasound-guided group(P < 0.05/3). Conclusions Real-time ul |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0253-9802 |
DOI: | 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9802.2024.01.012 |