Significance of searching for ganglia in the terminal rectum/fistula of complex anorectal malformations: Related to defecation function

The need to search for ganglia in the terminal rectum/fistula of complex anorectal malformations (ARMs) remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between ganglia absence in the terminal rectum/fistula and defecation function after anoplasty. A retrospective review of patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in pediatrics 2023-02, Vol.11, p.1124647-1124647
Hauptverfasser: Feng, Wei, Mu, Huaqi, Chen, Minmin, Zhu, Jin, Xiang, Chenzhu, Fan, Linxiao, Hou, Jinping, Die, Xiaohong, Wang, Yi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The need to search for ganglia in the terminal rectum/fistula of complex anorectal malformations (ARMs) remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between ganglia absence in the terminal rectum/fistula and defecation function after anoplasty. A retrospective review of patients who received anoplasty for treating male imperforate anus with rectobulbar (RB)/rectoprostatic (RP) fistulas at a tertiary pediatric hospital was conducted with registered demographic data, imaging study results, and information on the terminal rectum/fistula specimen (excision extension and pathological findings). According to the pathological findings, patients were divided into Groups 1 (ganglia absence) and 2 (ganglia presence). Furthermore, the postoperative defecation function was evaluated using various rating scale questionnaires. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0. Of the 62 patients, 18 (29.0%) showed ganglia absence in the terminal rectum/fistula. By analyzing the imaging data, spinal anomalies and spinal cord anomalies were found in 30.6% (19/62) and 56.5% (35/62) of patients, respectively. Baseline information was comparable between Groups 1 and 2 (  > 0.05). For defecation function, there were no significant differences in Kelly scores between the two groups (4.0 ± 0.8 vs. 4.4 ± 1.1,  = 0.177), while Krickenbeck (3.7 ± 1.8 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4) and Rintala (13.7 ± 3.6 vs. 16.0 ± 2.7) scores in Group 1 were significantly lower than those in Group 2 (both  
ISSN:2296-2360
2296-2360
DOI:10.3389/fped.2023.1124647