Comparison of different treatment strategies in the management of endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy: a multicentre retrospective study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different treatment strategies for endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients. According to Vial's standard, we defined endogenic-type CSP as (1) the gestational sac growing towards the uterine cavity and (2) a greater...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2022-05, Vol.22 (1), p.404-404, Article 404
Hauptverfasser: Qu, Wenjie, Li, Hua, Zhang, Teng, Zhang, Yuan, Ban, Yanli, Li, Ningfeng, Jiang, Jingyan, Xie, Juan, Shi, Wentian, Hao, Yiping, Li, Ruowen, Liu, Wei, Cui, Baoxia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different treatment strategies for endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients. According to Vial's standard, we defined endogenic-type CSP as (1) the gestational sac growing towards the uterine cavity and (2) a greater than 0.3 cm thickness of myometrial tissue at the caesarean scar. A total of 447 endogenic CSP patients out of 527 patients from 4 medical centres in China were enrolled in this study. A total of 120 patients were treated with methotrexate (MTX) followed by surgery, 106 received ultrasound-guided curettage directly and 221 received curettage combined with hysteroscopy. The clinical information and clinical outcomes of these patients were reviewed. Successful treatment was defined as (1) no additional treatment needed, (2) no retained mass of conception and (3) serum β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level returning to a normal level within 4 weeks. The success rate was analysed based on these factors. Among 447 patients, no significant difference was observed in baseline characteristics between groups except for foetal heartbeat. The success rate was significantly different (p
ISSN:1471-2393
1471-2393
DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-04633-y