Comparison of methodologies to define hemodialysis patients hyporesponsive to epoetin and impact on counts and characteristics

Some hemodialysis patients require large doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) to manage anemia. These patients, termed "ESA hyporesponsive," have been characterized using various definitions. We applied three definitions of hyporesponsiveness to a large, national cohort of hem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC nephrology 2013-02, Vol.14 (1), p.44-44, Article 44
Hauptverfasser: Gilbertson, David T, Peng, Yi, Arneson, Thomas J, Dunning, Stephan, Collins, Allan J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Some hemodialysis patients require large doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) to manage anemia. These patients, termed "ESA hyporesponsive," have been characterized using various definitions. We applied three definitions of hyporesponsiveness to a large, national cohort of hemodialysis patients to assess the impact of definition on counts and on characteristics associated with hyporesponsiveness. We studied point-prevalent hemodialysis patients on May 1, 2008, with Medicare as primary payer, who survived through December 31, 2008. Included patients received recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) in each month, August-December. Hyporesponsiveness definitions were: above the ninetieth percentile of total monthly EPO dose; above the ninetieth percentile of total monthly EPO dose divided by weight in kg; above the ninetieth percentile of total monthly EPO dose divided by hemoglobin level. Hyporesponsiveness was further classified as chronic, acute, or other. Comorbid conditions were assessed before and concurrent with the hyporesponsive period. Women, African Americans, and patients aged
ISSN:1471-2369
1471-2369
DOI:10.1186/1471-2369-14-44