Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae have better clinical outcomes than classical Klebsiella pneumoniae for lower respiratory tract infection patients

The clinical outcomes and microbiological features of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) caused by hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp) and classical Klebsiella pneumoniae (cKp) have not been well understood. This study collected 287 non-repetitive Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC microbiology 2025-01, Vol.25 (1), p.40-11, Article 40
Hauptverfasser: Zhuo, Xianxia, Lei, Zichen, Pu, Danni, Wu, Yongli, Zhao, Jiankang, Cao, Bin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The clinical outcomes and microbiological features of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) caused by hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp) and classical Klebsiella pneumoniae (cKp) have not been well understood. This study collected 287 non-repetitive Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from 287 LRTI patients. All these strains underwent annotation for resistance and virulence factors, with 141 strains undergoing mouse infection experiments to assess their virulence. The primary clinical outcomes of these patients were evaluated, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission and in-hospital mortality rates. A total of 46 capsule serotypes were identified. Among these isolates subjected to mouse infection experiments, the proportions of strains exhibiting hypervirulent phenotypes were 92.6% (25/27), 92.1% (35/38), 80% (4/5), 25% (1/4), 10.5% (2/19), and 7.1% (1/14) for K2, K1, K20, K54, K47, and K25, respectively. Therefore, K1, K2, and K20 K. pneumoniae were defined as hvKp. In addition, the rates of ICU admission and in-hospital mortality for hvKp-infected patients were significantly lower than those of cKp-infected patients (51.4% vs. 65.9%, χ2 = 4.722, p = 0.03 and 8.6% vs. 29%, χ2 = 12.133, p 
ISSN:1471-2180
1471-2180
DOI:10.1186/s12866-024-03726-2