Analytical Evaluation of Point-of-Care Finecare™ Procalcitonin Rapid Quantitative Test in Sepsis Population as Compared with Elecsys ® BRAHMS Procalcitonin Immunoassay

The study compared two plasma procalcitonin (PCT) assays, the point of care (POC) Finecare™ Procalcitonin Rapid Quantitative Test and the Elecsys BRAHMS PCT immunoassay, in sepsis ICU patients. Forty-one plasma samples were analyzed, showing a strong correlation (r = 0.98) and no significant differe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostics (Basel) 2024-05, Vol.14 (11), p.1080
Hauptverfasser: Mazlan, Mohd Zulfakar, Wan Azman, Wan Norlina, Yaacob, Najib Majdi, Koon, Tan Say, Yahya, Nurul Khaiza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The study compared two plasma procalcitonin (PCT) assays, the point of care (POC) Finecare™ Procalcitonin Rapid Quantitative Test and the Elecsys BRAHMS PCT immunoassay, in sepsis ICU patients. Forty-one plasma samples were analyzed, showing a strong correlation (r = 0.98) and no significant difference in PCT values. The mean POC PCT value was 4.46 ng/mL (SD 8.68), and for laboratory BRAHMS PCT, it was 4.67 ng/mL (SD 10.03). The study found a strong linear relationship between plasma POC PCT and laboratory BRAHMS PCT (r = 0.98). Different regression methods showed varying intercepts and slopes: Ordinary Least Squares had an intercept of 0.49 and a slope of 0.85; Deming regression showed an intercept of 0.43 and a slope of 0.86; Passing-Bablok regression showed an intercept of 0.02 and a slope of 1.08. Precision results for cut-offs of 0.5 ng/mL were a coefficient of variation (CV) of 5%, and for 2.5 ng/mL, the CV was 2.5%. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) for linearity was ≥0.99. The study revealed no significant difference between the POC Finecare™ PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT immunoassay in sepsis samples from ICU patients, supported by strong correlation, minimal bias, a consistent CV, and linearity.
ISSN:2075-4418
2075-4418
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14111080