Debugging of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) Models

In model checking, a counterexample is considered as a valuable tool for debugging. In Probabilistic Model Checking (PMC), counterexample generation has a quantitative aspect. The counterexample in PMC is a set of paths in which a path formula holds, and their accumulative probability mass violates...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science 2016-08, Vol.224 (Proc. CREST 2016), p.25-39
1. Verfasser: Debbi, Hichem
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In model checking, a counterexample is considered as a valuable tool for debugging. In Probabilistic Model Checking (PMC), counterexample generation has a quantitative aspect. The counterexample in PMC is a set of paths in which a path formula holds, and their accumulative probability mass violates the probability threshold. However, understanding the counterexample is not an easy task. In this paper we address the task of counterexample analysis for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). We propose an aided-diagnostic method for probabilistic counterexamples based on the notions of causality, responsibility and blame. Given a counterexample for a Probabilistic CTL (PCTL) formula that does not hold over an MDP model, this method guides the user to the most relevant parts of the model that led to the violation.
ISSN:2075-2180
2075-2180
DOI:10.4204/EPTCS.224.4