Intelligent Robust Controllers Applied to an Auxiliary Energy System for Electric Vehicles

This paper presents two intelligent robust control strategies applied to manage the dynamics of a DC-DC bidirectional buck–boost converter, which is used in conjunction with a supercapacitor as an auxiliary energy system (AES) for regenerative braking in electric vehicles. The Neural Inverse Optimal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World Electric Vehicle Journal 2024-10, Vol.15 (10), p.479
Hauptverfasser: Ruz Canul, Mario Antonio, Ruz-Hernandez, Jose A., Alanis, Alma Y., Rullan-Lara, Jose-Luis, Garcia-Hernandez, Ramon, Vior-Franco, Jaime R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper presents two intelligent robust control strategies applied to manage the dynamics of a DC-DC bidirectional buck–boost converter, which is used in conjunction with a supercapacitor as an auxiliary energy system (AES) for regenerative braking in electric vehicles. The Neural Inverse Optimal Controller (NIOC) and the Neural Sliding Mode Controller (NSMC) utilize identifiers based on Recurrent High-Order Neural Networks (RHONNs) trained with the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) to track voltage and current references from the converter circuit. Additionally, a driving cycle test tailored specifically for typical urban driving in electric vehicles (EVs) is implemented to validate the efficacy of the proposed controller and energy improvement strategy. The proposed NSMC and NIOC are compared with a PI controller; furthermore, an induction motor and its corresponding three-phase inverter are incorporated into the EV control scheme which is implemented in Matlab/Simulink using the “Simscape Electrical” toolbox. The Mean Squared Error (MSE) is computed to validate the performance of the neural controllers. Additionally, the improvement in the State of Charge (SOC) for an electric vehicle battery through the control of buck–boost converter dynamics is addressed. Finally, several robustness tests against parameter changes in the converter are conducted, along with their corresponding performance indices.
ISSN:2032-6653
2032-6653
DOI:10.3390/wevj15100479