Retrospective batch analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a clinically deployed AI algorithm for the detection of acute pulmonary embolism on CTPA

Purpose To generate and extend the evidence on the clinical validity of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to detect acute pulmonary embolism (PE) on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) of patients suspected of PE and to evaluate the possibility of reducing the risk of missed findings in clinical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Insights into imaging 2023-06, Vol.14 (1), p.102-102, Article 102
Hauptverfasser: Langius-Wiffen, Eline, de Jong, Pim A., Hoesein, Firdaus A. Mohamed, Dekker, Lisette, van den Hoven, Andor F., Nijholt, Ingrid M., Boomsma, Martijn F., Veldhuis, Wouter B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To generate and extend the evidence on the clinical validity of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to detect acute pulmonary embolism (PE) on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) of patients suspected of PE and to evaluate the possibility of reducing the risk of missed findings in clinical practice with AI-assisted reporting. Methods Consecutive CTPA scan data of 3316 patients referred because of suspected PE between 24-2-2018 and 31-12-2020 were retrospectively analysed by a CE-certified and FDA-approved AI algorithm. The output of the AI was compared with the attending radiologists’ report. To define the reference standard, discordant findings were independently evaluated by two readers. In case of disagreement, an experienced cardiothoracic radiologist adjudicated. Results According to the reference standard, PE was present in 717 patients (21.6%). PE was missed by the AI in 23 patients, while the attending radiologist missed 60 PE. The AI detected 2 false positives and the attending radiologist 9. The sensitivity for the detection of PE by the AI algorithm was significantly higher compared to the radiology report (96.8% vs. 91.6%, p  
ISSN:1869-4101
1869-4101
DOI:10.1186/s13244-023-01454-1