Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer (PC) to reduce target volume delineation uncertainty. This study aimed to assess and validate the performance of a fully automated segmentation tool (AST) in MRI based radiation therapy planning of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics and imaging in radiation oncology 2020-01, Vol.13, p.14-20
Hauptverfasser: Kuisma, Anna, Ranta, Iiro, Keyriläinen, Jani, Suilamo, Sami, Wright, Pauliina, Pesola, Marko, Warner, Lizette, Löyttyniemi, Eliisa, Minn, Heikki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer (PC) to reduce target volume delineation uncertainty. This study aimed to assess and validate the performance of a fully automated segmentation tool (AST) in MRI based radiation therapy planning of PC. Pelvic structures of 65 PC patients delineated in an MRI-only workflow according to established guidelines were included in the analysis. Automatic vs manual segmentation by an experienced oncologist was compared with geometrical parameters, such as the dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Fifteen patients had a second MRI within 15 days to assess repeatability of the AST for prostate and seminal vesicles. Furthermore, we investigated whether hormonal therapy or body mass index (BMI) affected the AST results. The AST showed high agreement with manual segmentation expressed as DSC (mean, SD) for delineating prostate (0.84, 0.04), bladder (0.92, 0.04) and rectum (0.86, 0.04). For seminal vesicles (0.56, 0.17) and penile bulb (0.69, 0.12) the respective agreement was moderate. Performance of AST was not influenced by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, although those on treatment had significantly smaller prostates than the hormone-naïve patients (p 
ISSN:2405-6316
2405-6316
DOI:10.1016/j.phro.2020.02.004