Comparison of maintenance effect of probiotics and aminosalicylates on ulcerative colitis:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Objective: To evaluate the maintenance effect of probiotics versus that of aminosalicylates on ulcerative colitis. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Chinese Biomedical Database were searched in English or Chinese. Data extracted were selected with strict crit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chronic diseases and translational medicine 2016-03, Vol.2 (1), p.34-41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To evaluate the maintenance effect of probiotics versus that of aminosalicylates on ulcerative colitis. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Chinese Biomedical Database were searched in English or Chinese. Data extracted were selected with strict criteria. Results: In six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), a total of 721 participants were enrolled and the maintenance effect of probiotics (n ? 364) versus that of aminosalicylates (n ? 357) on ulcerative colitis was investigated. No significant difference was observed between probiotics and aminosalicylate groups (relative risk (RR) ? 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91e1.28;P ? 0.40). Three RCTs compared the incidence of adverse events with probiotics versus those with aminosalicylates. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (RR ? 1.20;95%CI:0.92e1.56;P ? 0.17). Conclusions: Probiotics and aminosalicylates both showed a maintenance effect on ulcerative colitis. However, more well-designed RCTs are required. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2095-882X 2589-0514 2589-0514 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cdtm.2016.07.002 |