An Alternative Explanation for the Alleged ‘Imperatival’ Participles of Romans 12:9-21
The participles of Romans 12:9-21 have occasioned much discussion among grammarians and commentators. The primary debate concerns whether the participles are functioning imperativally or whether they might be connected with a finite verb in the context of the passage. This article suggests that the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tyndale bulletin (1966) 2010-11, Vol.61 (2) |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The participles of Romans 12:9-21 have occasioned much discussion among grammarians and commentators. The primary debate concerns whether the participles are functioning imperativally or whether they might be connected with a finite verb in the context of the passage. This article suggests that the participles might indeed be connected with a finite verb, but one that is unexpressed in the passage. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0082-7118 2752-7042 |
DOI: | 10.53751/001c.29291 |