Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fracture Treated with Plantar Plating: Retrospective Multi-Surgeon Case Series

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Sports; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are a common foot injury. Previous surgical treatments have consisted of intramedullary screw fixation and a newer technique of plantar plating due to non-union and refractures seen with screw fixati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot & ankle orthopaedics 2022-01, Vol.7 (1), p.2473011421S00199
Hauptverfasser: Gardner, Stephanie S., Klavas, Derek M., Cosculluela, Pedro E., Hanson, Travis W., Heier, Keith A., Varner, Kevin E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Sports; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are a common foot injury. Previous surgical treatments have consisted of intramedullary screw fixation and a newer technique of plantar plating due to non-union and refractures seen with screw fixation. Purpose of this multi-surgeon case series study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes and complication rates after fifth metatarsal plating for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures in recreational and elite athletes. Methods: Retrospective multiple surgeon case series involving patients who underwent fifth metatarsal plantar plating for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures with a mean follow-up of 33.1 months (range, 12-52). Elite and recreational athletes were included. Demographic data, radiographic evaluation, and clinical notes were analyzed. Patient phone conversations were made to document complications outside of our electronic medical record. Results: Forty-four patients (45 fractures) were treated with plantar plating technique with a mean age of 37.3 years (range 14- 80). Five patients sustained refractures (11.1% of patients), 2 at previous fracture site, 1 through a screw hole, 1 proximal to plate, and 1 distal to plate. All refractures were treated non-operatively. No wound complications were seen. No secondary revision surgery was needed and union rate was 100% at final follow up. Conclusion: With a one year minimum follow up, plantar plating of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures is a viable option for treatment of both acute and chronic fractures as well as after failed intramedullary screw fixation with low refracture rates and without non-unions. Plantar plating allows the surgeon to have direct visualization of fracture reduction and ease of access for bone grafting. Both elite and recreational athletes can benefit from the plating technique.
ISSN:2473-0114
2473-0114
DOI:10.1177/2473011421S00199