Clinical Significance of Pathogenicity of Somatic Mutations in Oral Leukoplakia: a Prospective Observational Study

Background. The vast majority of malignant neoplasms of the oral mucosa refer to squamous cell carcinomas. The development of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral mucosa is often promoted by previous potentially malignant diseases, with oral leukoplakia dominating among them. Objective. To determine the clinical significance of the pathogenicity of somatic mutations in oral mucosal leukoplakia. Methods. The study material included 24 samples of abnormal epithelium of the oral mucosa from leukoplakia patients. QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany) was used for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction from the samples. DNA sequencing was performed using IlluminaNextSeq 550 sequencer and TruSight™ Oncology 500 DNA Kit For Use with NextSeq (Illumina, USA). All DNA extractions from biological samples, preparation and sequencing of DNA libraries were performed step-by-step in strict accordance with the guidelines provided with the respective reagent kits. Bioinformatics analysis was carried out using specific software Illumina Base Space (Illumina, USA) and Galaxy Project (The Galaxy Community, a non-profit international project) according to current guidelines. The desired power of the study accounted for 90%. Two Proportions Z test was performed by means of The Sample Size Calculation of Statistica 12 (StatSoft, Inc.) with the set option “one-tailed hypothesis”, because it was initially assumed that pathogenic (oncogenic) genetic variants occur in the tissue of oral leukoplakia much more frequently than in the human reference genome used for sequence alignment. Results. The pathogenic somatic mutations in the TP53 , KRAS , APC , NRAs and BRAF genes, identified in this study, alone or in combination, are highly likely (hazard ratio 3000-11000) to be associated with the development of oral mucosal leukoplakia and low-grade epithelial dysplasia. The multiplicity of pathogenic and likely pathogenic genetic variants associated with epithelial dysplasia, as well as the fact that a number of variants do not occur in all patients, suggests that the same histotype of oral mucosal dysplasia may develop under the influence of different mutations. Conclusion. The pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants of the TP53, KRAS, APC, NRAS and BRAF genes, identified in this study, alone or in combination, are highly likely (hazard ratio 3000–11000) to be associated with the development of leukoplakia and low-grade epithelial dysplasia.