Effect of mountainous rainfall on uncertainty in flood model parameter estimation

Explaining the significant variability of rainfall in orographically complex mountainous regions remains a challenging task even for modern raingauge networks. To address this issue, a real-time spatial rainfall field estimation model, called WREPN (WRF Rainfall-Elevation Parameterized Nowcasting),...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrology Research 2024-02, Vol.55 (2), p.221-236
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Jeonghoon, Choi, Jeonghyeon, Jang, Suhyung, Kim, Sangdan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Explaining the significant variability of rainfall in orographically complex mountainous regions remains a challenging task even for modern raingauge networks. To address this issue, a real-time spatial rainfall field estimation model, called WREPN (WRF Rainfall-Elevation Parameterized Nowcasting), has been developed, incorporating the influence of mountain effect based on ground raingauge networks. In this study, we examined the effect of mountainous rainfall estimates on the uncertainty of flood model parameter estimation. As a comparison, an inverse distance weighting technique was applied to ground raingauge data to estimate the spatial rainfall field. To convert the spatial rainfall fields into flood volumes, we employed the ModClark model, a conceptual rainfall–runoff model with distributed rainfall input. Bayesian theory was applied for parameter estimation to incorporate uncertainty analysis. The ModClark model demonstrated good flood reproducibility regardless of the estimation method for spatial rainfall fields. Parameter estimation results indicated that the WREPN spatial rainfall field, which accounted for the influence of the mountain effect, led to lower curve numbers due to higher estimated rainfall compared to the IDW spatial rainfall field, while the concentration time and storage coefficient showed minimal differences.
ISSN:0029-1277
1998-9563
2224-7955
DOI:10.2166/nh.2024.144