Identification of a novel nine‐SnoRNA signature with potential prognostic and therapeutic value in ovarian cancer

Background Increasing evidence has been confirmed that small nucleolar RNAs (SnoRNAs) play critical roles in tumorigenesis and exhibit prognostic value in clinical practice. However, there is short of systematic research on SnoRNAs in ovarian cancer (OV). Material/Methods 379 OV patients with RNA‐Se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer Medicine 2022-05, Vol.11 (10), p.2159-2170
Hauptverfasser: Zhu, Wenjing, Zhang, Tao, Luan, Shaohong, Kong, Qingnuan, Hu, Wenmin, Zou, Xin, Zheng, Feibo, Han, Wei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Increasing evidence has been confirmed that small nucleolar RNAs (SnoRNAs) play critical roles in tumorigenesis and exhibit prognostic value in clinical practice. However, there is short of systematic research on SnoRNAs in ovarian cancer (OV). Material/Methods 379 OV patients with RNA‐Seq and clinical parameters from TCGA database and 5 paired clinical OV tissues were embedded in our study. Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic SnoRNAs and construct prediction model. SNORic database was adopted to examine the copy number variation of SnoRNAs. ROC curves and KM plot curves were applied to validate the prognostic model. Besides, the model was validated in 5 paired clinical tissues by real‐time PCR, H&E staining and immunohistochemistry. Results A prognostic model was constructed on the basis of SnoRNAs in OV patients. Patients with higher RiskScore had poor clinicopathological parameters, including higher age, larger tumor size, advanced stage and with tumor status. KM plot analysis confirmed that patients with higher RiskScore had poorer prognosis in subgroup of age, tumor size, and stage. 7 of 9 SnoRNAs in the prognostic model had positive correlation with their host genes. Moreover, 5 of 9 SnoRNAs in the prognostic model correlated with their CNVs, and SNORD105B had the strongest correction with its CNVs. ROC curve showed that the RiskScore had excellent specificity and accuracy. Further, results of H&E staining and immunohistochemistry of Ki67, P53 and P16 confirmed that patients with higher RiskScore are more malignant. Conclusions In summary, we identified a nine‐SnoRNAs signature as an independent indicator to predict prognosis of OV, providing a prospective prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic targets for ovarian cancer. Our study established a nine‐snoRNA signature as an independent prognosis indicator for OV, and it may provide potential therapeutic targets for ovarian cancer.
ISSN:2045-7634
2045-7634
DOI:10.1002/cam4.4598