Learning Curve and Clinical Outcomes of Ultrasonic Osteotome‐based En Bloc Laminectomy for Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum
Objective Despite rapid advances in minimally invasive surgery, en bloc laminectomy remains the most common surgical approach for treating thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF). However, the learning curve of this risky operation is rarely reported. Therefore, we aimed to describe an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Orthopaedic surgery 2023-09, Vol.15 (9), p.2318-2327 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
Despite rapid advances in minimally invasive surgery, en bloc laminectomy remains the most common surgical approach for treating thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF). However, the learning curve of this risky operation is rarely reported. Therefore, we aimed to describe and analyze the learning curve of ultrasonic osteotome‐based en bloc laminectomy for TOLF.
Methods
Among 151 consecutive patients with TOLF who underwent en bloc laminectomy performed by one surgeon between January 2012 and December 2017, we retrospectively analyzed their demographic data, surgical parameters, and neurological function. Neurological outcome was evaluated with the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale, and the Hirabayashi method was used to calculate the neurological recovery rate. The learning curve was assessed with logarithmic curve‐fitting regression analysis. Univariate analysis methods were used for statistical analysis, including t‐test, rank sum test, and chi‐square test.
Results
A total of 50% of learning milestones could be reached in approximately 14 cases, and the asymptote in 76 cases. Therefore, 76 of the 151 enrolled patients were defined as the “early group,” and the remaining 75 were delimitated as the “late group” for comparison. There was a significant intergroup difference in the corrected operative time (94.80 ± 27.77 vs 65.93 ± 15.67 min, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1757-7853 1757-7861 |
DOI: | 10.1111/os.13804 |