مقایسه میزان سرعت و درک خواندن دانش‌آموزان کاشت حلزون شده و شنوای پایه اول دبستان

Introduction: Hearing is the most important sense for the natural development of speech and language; therefore, deaf individuals more commonly show signs of communication disabilities. Since reading skills depend on natural development of speech and language in childhood, reading impairments are pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Majallah-i pizhūhish dar ̒ulūm-i tavānbakhshī (Online) 2017-03, Vol.12 (4), p.194-199
Hauptverfasser: Fereshteh Shamsian, Zohreh Farghadani-Chaharsughi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:per
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: Hearing is the most important sense for the natural development of speech and language; therefore, deaf individuals more commonly show signs of communication disabilities. Since reading skills depend on natural development of speech and language in childhood, reading impairments are prevalent in deaf people. Cochlear implantation, through providing auditory input and improving speech and language abilities, can improve reading prerequisites and reduce reading problems. This research aimed to compare reading speed and comprehension between cochlear implanted and healthy students in the first grade of primary school. Materials and Methods: The average of text reading speed and percentage of reading comprehension responses was calculated in 11 cochlear implanted children and compared with that of 11 healthy students through statistical methods. Results: The independent t-test showed significant differences between cochlear implanted and healthy students in terms of reading speed and percentage of reading comprehension responses (P < 0.001, α = 0.05). Conclusion: The results indicated that cochlear implanted children had problems in reading fluency and speed and comprehension of written texts since the first grade of elementary school in comparison with their healthy peers. These problems seem to be rooted in language deficits. However, many individual differences were observed among these children.
ISSN:1735-7519
2008-2606
DOI:10.22122/jrrs.v12i4.2684