Effect of empagliflozin on left ventricular contractility and peak oxygen uptake in subjects with type 2 diabetes without heart disease: results of the EMPA-HEART trial

Background The mechanism through which sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) prevent the incidence of heart failure and/or affect cardiac structure and function remains unclear. Methods The EMPA-HEART trial is aimed at verifying whether empagliflozin improves myocardial contractility (l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular Diabetology 2022-09, Vol.21 (1), p.1-181, Article 181
Hauptverfasser: Nesti, Lorenzo, Pugliese, Nicola Riccardo, Sciuto, Paolo, Trico, Domenico, Dardano, Angela, Baldi, Simona, Pinnola, Silvia, Fabiani, Iacopo, Di Bello, Vitantonio, Natali, Andrea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The mechanism through which sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) prevent the incidence of heart failure and/or affect cardiac structure and function remains unclear. Methods The EMPA-HEART trial is aimed at verifying whether empagliflozin improves myocardial contractility (left ventricle global longitudinal strain, LV-GLS) and/or cardiopulmonary fitness (peak oxygen uptake, VO2peak) in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) without heart disease. Patients with T2D, normal LV systolic function (2D-Echo EF > 50%), and no heart disease were randomized to either empagliflozin 10 mg or sitagliptin 100 mg for 6 months and underwent repeated cardiopulmonary exercise tests with echocardiography and determination of plasma biomarkers. Results Forty-four patients completed the study, 22 per arm. Despite comparable glycaemic control, modest reductions in body weight (- 1.6; [- 2.7/- 0.5] kg, p = 0.03) and plasma uric acid (- 1.5; [- 2.3/- 0.6], p = 0.002), as well as an increase in haemoglobin (+ 0.7; [+ 0.2/+ 1.1] g/dL, p = 0.0003) were evident with empagliflozin. No difference was detectable in either LV-GLS at 1 month (empagliflozin vs sitagliptin: + 0.44; [- 0.10/+ 0.98]%, p = 0.11) and 6 months of therapy (+ 0.53; [- 0.56/+ 1.62]%), or in VO.sub.2peak (+ 0.43; [- 1.4/+ 2.3] mL/min/kg, p = 0.65). With empagliflozin, the subgroup with baseline LV-GLS below the median experienced a greater increase (time*drug p < 0.05) in LV-GLS at 1 month (+ 1.22; [+ 0.31/+ 2.13]%) and 6 months (+ 2.05; [+ 1.14/+ 2.96]%), while sitagliptin induced a modest improvement in LV-GLS only at 6 months (+ 0.92; [+ 0.21/+ 0.62]%). Conclusions Empagliflozin has neutral impact on both LV-GLS and exercise tolerance in subjects with T2D and normal left ventricular function. However, in patients with subclinical dysfunction (LV-GLS < 16.5%) it produces a rapid and sustained amelioration of LV contractility. Trial registration EUDRACT Code 2016-002225-10 Keywords: Empagliflozin, SGLT2, Type 2 diabetes, GLS, Speckle-tracking, Cardiovascular, Heart failure, Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction
ISSN:1475-2840
1475-2840
DOI:10.1186/s12933-022-01618-1