Risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy surgery: development and validation of an interpretable machine learning prediction modelResearch in context

Background: Current models for predicting intraoperative hemorrhage in cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) are constrained by known risk factors and conventional statistical methods. Our objective is to develop an interpretable prediction model using machine learning (ML) techniques to assess the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during CSEP in women, followed by external validation and clinical application. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study utilized electronic medical record (EMR) data from four tertiary medical institutions. The model was developed using data from 1680 patients with CSEP diagnosed and treated at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, and Dezhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2023. External validation data were obtained from Liao Cheng Dong Chang Fu District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023. Random forest (RF), Lasso, Boruta, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were employed to identify the most influential variables in the model development data set; the best variables were selected based on reaching the λmin value. Model development involved eight machine learning methods with ten-fold cross-validation. Accuracy and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess model performance for selection of the optimal model. Internal validation of the model utilized area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, Matthews correlation coefficient, and F1 score. These same indicators were also applied to evaluate external validation performance of the model. Finally, visualization techniques were used to present the optimal model which was then deployed for clinical application via network applications. Findings: Setting λmin at the value of 0.003, the optimal variable combination containing 9 variables was selected for model development. The optimal prediction model (Bayes) had an accuracy of 0.879 (95% CI: 0.857–0.901) an AUC of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.860–0.904), a DCA curve maximum threshold probability of 0.41, and a maximum return of 7.86%. The internal validation accuracy was 0.869 (95% CI: 0.847–0.891), an AUC of 0.822 (95% CI: 0.801–0.843), a sensitivity of 0.938, a specificity of 0.422, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.392, and an F1 score of 0.925. In the external validation, the accuracy was 0.936 (95% CI: 0.913–0.959), an AUC