Jet veto resummation with jet rapidity cuts

A bstract Jet vetoes are widely used in experimental analyses at the LHC to distinguish different hard-interaction processes. Experimental jet selections require a cut on the (pseudo)rapidity of reconstructed jets, | η jet | ≤ η cut . We extend the standard jet- p T (jet-veto) resummation, which imp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of high energy physics 2019-04, Vol.2019 (4), p.1-51, Article 142
Hauptverfasser: Michel, Johannes K. L., Pietrulewicz, Piotr, Tackmann, Frank J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A bstract Jet vetoes are widely used in experimental analyses at the LHC to distinguish different hard-interaction processes. Experimental jet selections require a cut on the (pseudo)rapidity of reconstructed jets, | η jet | ≤ η cut . We extend the standard jet- p T (jet-veto) resummation, which implicitly works in the limit η cut → ∞, by incorporating a finite jet rapidity cut. We also consider the case of a step in the required p T cut at an intermediate value of | η | ≃ 2.5, which is of experimental relevance to avoid the increased pile-up contamination beyond the reach of the tracking detectors. We identify all relevant parametric regimes, discuss their factorization and resummation as well as the relations between them, and show that the phenomenologically relevant regimes are free of large nonglobal logarithms. The η cut dependence of all resummation ingredients is computed to the same order to which they are currently known for η cut → ∞. Our results pave the way for carrying out the jet-veto resummation including a sharp cut or a step at η cut to the same order as is currently available in the η cut → ∞ limit. The numerical impact of the jet rapidity cut is illustrated for benchmark q q ¯ and gg initiated color-singlet processes at NLL′+NLO. We find that a rapidity cut at high η cut = 4.5 is safe to use and has little effect on the cross section. A sharp cut at η cut = 2.5 can in some cases lead to a substantial increase in the perturbative uncertainties, which can be mitigated by instead using a step in the veto.
ISSN:1029-8479
1029-8479
DOI:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)142