Factors affecting vaccination demand in Indonesia: a secondary analysis and multimethods national assessment

ObjectivesVaccine hesitancy remains a major barrier to immunisation coverage worldwide. We explored influence of hesitancy on coverage and factors contributing to vaccine uptake during a national measles–rubella (MR) campaign in Indonesia.DesignSecondary analyses of qualitative and quantitative data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2022-08, Vol.12 (8), p.e058570-e058570
Hauptverfasser: Jusril, Hafizah, Rachmi, Cut Novianti, Amin, Mohammad Ruhul, Dynes, Michelle, Sitohang, Vensya, Untung, Andi Sari Bunga, Damayanti, Rita, Ariawan, Iwan, Pronyk, Paul M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectivesVaccine hesitancy remains a major barrier to immunisation coverage worldwide. We explored influence of hesitancy on coverage and factors contributing to vaccine uptake during a national measles–rubella (MR) campaign in Indonesia.DesignSecondary analyses of qualitative and quantitative data sets from existing cross-sectional studies conducted during and around the campaign.MethodsQuantitative data used in this assessment included daily coverage reports generated by health workers, district risk profiles that indicate precampaign immunisation programme performance, and reports of campaign cessation due to vaccine hesitancy. We used t-test and χ2 tests for associations. The qualitative assessment employed three parallel national and regional studies. Deductive thematic analysis examined factors for acceptance among caregivers, health providers and programme managers.ResultsCoverage data were reported from 6462 health facilities across 395 districts from 1 August to 31 December 2018. The average district coverage was 73%, with wide variation between districts (2%–100%). One-third of districts fell below 70% coverage thresholds. Sixty-two of 395 (16%) districts paused the campaign due to hesitancy. Coverage among districts that never paused campaign activities due to hesitancy was significantly higher than rates for districts ever-pausing the campaign (81% vs 42%; p
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058570