Comparison of weight-based and pinna size method for ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size selection in children receiving general anesthesia: A randomized clinical study
Several methods are in use for LMA ProSeal™ size selection in pediatric patients. Weight-based method is most commonly used. Pinna size-based method is a promising new technique for accurate size selection. A total of 146 children aged between 6 months and 12 years undergoing surgery under general s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology clinical pharmacology, 2024-01, Vol.40 (1), p.63-68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Several methods are in use for LMA ProSeal™ size selection in pediatric patients. Weight-based method is most commonly used. Pinna size-based method is a promising new technique for accurate size selection.
A total of 146 children aged between 6 months and 12 years undergoing surgery under general surgery were included. They were randomized into either pinna-based group (group X) or weight-based group (group Y). Both groups were compared for accurate placement of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), ease of insertion, number of attempts needed, and peak airway pressures.
A Comparable number of patients had a Brimacombe score of 3 and above, indicating correct placement in both groups (
= 0.407). PLMA was easily inserted in 79.5% and 87.7% of patients of groups X and Y, respectively (
= 0.180). Insertion was found to be difficult in 20.5% of patients in group X, whereas it was difficult in only 12.3% of patients of group Y (
= 0.180). The two groups were comparable as per the number of attempts needed for insertion (
= 0.161). Mean peak airway pressures too were comparable between both groups. Ease of insertion too, was statistically insignificant between both groups.
Pinna size-based estimation of LMA size is an effective alternative method to weight-based selection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0970-9185 2231-2730 0970-9185 2231-2730 |
DOI: | 10.4103/joacp.joacp_217_22 |