The sematic extension of “human colors” - red, ruddy and ginger in light of conceptual integration theory
The meaning scopes of the words red, ruddy and ginger, used as color adjectives to characterize a person, have a different scope of meaning from the adjective red, whose polysemantic structure is much richer. These ?human color? adjectives have somewhat different extensions compared to the adjective...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Južnoslovenski filolog 2017, Vol.73 (1-2), p.115-133 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The meaning scopes of the words red, ruddy and ginger, used as color
adjectives to characterize a person, have a different scope of meaning from
the adjective red, whose polysemantic structure is much richer. These ?human
color? adjectives have somewhat different extensions compared to the
adjective red, and this is frequently manifested in their inability to
realize themselves within certain grammatical structures, in which it is
still possible to realize the adjective red. Relying on conceptual
integration theory, we have analyzed the relationship between the semantic
extensions of these adjectives and reached the conclusion that there is a
pyramidal hierarchical relation between these lexemes in which the adjective
red is naturally dominant as the color designation.
nema |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0350-185X 2406-0763 |
DOI: | 10.2298/JFI1702115I |