Role of catheter location on local impedance measurements and clinical outcome with the new direct sense technology in cardiac ablation procedures

A novel catheter technology (direct sense, DS) enables periprocedural local impedance (LI) measurement for estimation of tissue contact during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for real-time assessment of lesion generation. This measure reflects specific local myocardial conduction properties in contras...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature 2022-10, Vol.42, p.101109-101109, Article 101109
Hauptverfasser: Pesch, E., Riesinger, L., Vonderlin, N., Kupusovic, J., Koehler, M., Bruns, F., Janosi, R.A., Kochhäuser, S., Dobrev, D., Rassaf, T., Wakili, R., Siebermair, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A novel catheter technology (direct sense, DS) enables periprocedural local impedance (LI) measurement for estimation of tissue contact during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for real-time assessment of lesion generation. This measure reflects specific local myocardial conduction properties in contrast to the established global impedance (GI) using a neutral body electrode. Our study aimed to assess representative LI values for the cardiac chambers, to evaluate LI drop in response to RF delivery and to compare those values to established GI measures in patients undergoing RFA procedures. Seventy-three patients undergoing RFA with the DS technology were included. Within the cardiac chambers, baseline LI was significantly different, with the highest values in the left atrium (LA 107.5 ± 14.3 Ω; RV 104.6 Ω ± 12.9 Ω; LV 100.7 Ω ± 11.7 Ω, and RA 100.5 Ω ± 13.4 Ω). Baseline LI was positively correlated to the corresponding LI drop during RF delivery (R2 = 0.26, p = 0.01) representing a promising surrogate of lesion generation. The observed mean LI drop (15.6 ± 9.5 Ω) was threefold higher as GI drop (4.9 ± 7.4 Ω), p 
ISSN:2352-9067
2352-9067
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101109