Continual measurement of arterial dP/dtmax enables minimally invasive monitoring of left ventricular contractility in patients with acute heart failure

Background Continuous, reliable evaluation of left ventricular (LV) contractile function in patients with advanced heart failure requiring intensive care remains challenging. Continual monitoring of dP/dt.sub.max from the arterial line has recently become available in hemodynamic monitoring. However...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care (London, England) England), 2019-11, Vol.23 (1), p.1-364, Article 364
Hauptverfasser: Ostadal, Petr, Vondrakova, Dagmar, Krüger, Andreas, Janotka, Marek, Naar, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Continuous, reliable evaluation of left ventricular (LV) contractile function in patients with advanced heart failure requiring intensive care remains challenging. Continual monitoring of dP/dt.sub.max from the arterial line has recently become available in hemodynamic monitoring. However, the relationship between arterial dP/dt.sub.max and LV dP/dt.sub.max remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the relationship between arterial dP/dt.sub.max and LV dP/dt.sub.max assessed using echocardiography in patients with acute heart failure. Methods Forty-eight patients (mean age 70.4 years [65% male]) with acute heart failure requiring intensive care and hemodynamic monitoring were recruited. Hemodynamic variables, including arterial dP/dt.sub.max, were continually monitored using arterial line pressure waveform analysis. LV dP/dt.sub.max was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler analysis of mitral regurgitation flow. Results Values from continual arterial dP/dt.sub.max monitoring were significantly correlated with LV dP/dt.sub.max assessed using echocardiography (r = 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.82]; P < 0.0001). Linear regression analysis revealed that LV dP/dt.sub.max = 1.25 x (arterial dP/dt.sub.max) (P < 0.0001). Arterial dP/dt.sub.max was also significantly correlated with stroke volume (SV) (r = 0.63; P < 0.0001) and cardiac output (CO) (r = 0.42; P = 0.0289). In contrast, arterial dP/dt.sub.max was not correlated with SV variation, dynamic arterial elastance, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), or mean arterial pressure. Markedly stronger agreement between arterial and LV dP/dt.sub.max was observed in subgroups with higher SVR (N = 28; r = 0.91; P < 0.0001), lower CO (N = 26; r = 0.81; P < 0.0001), and lower SV (N = 25; r = 0.60; P = 0.0014). A weak correlation was observed in the subjects with lower SVR (N = 20; r = 0.61; P = 0.0004); in the subgroups with higher CO (N = 22) and higher SV (N = 23), no significant correlation was found. Conclusion Our results suggest that in patients with acute heart failure requiring intensive care with an arterial line, continuous calculation of arterial dP/dt.sub.max may be used for monitoring LV contractility, especially in those with higher SVR, lower CO, and lower SV, such as in patients experiencing cardiogenic shock. On the other hand, there was only a weak or no significant correlation in the subgroups with higher CO, higher SV, and lower SVR. Keywords: Left ventricle, C
ISSN:1364-8535
1364-8535
1366-609X
1466-609X
DOI:10.1186/s13054-019-2654-8