Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predicts clinicopathological parameters and stages of endometrial carcinomas

ABSTRACT Background We investigated the agreement and accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with postoperative pathological characteristics and stages of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Methods We recruited 527 women with EEC who underwent staging surgery at a single me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer medicine (Malden, MA) MA), 2022-02, Vol.11 (4), p.993-1004
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Chia‐Ying, Tai, Yi‐Jou, Shih, I‐Lun, Chiang, Ying‐Cheng, Chen, Yu‐Li, Hsu, Heng‐Cheng, Cheng, Wen‐Fang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Background We investigated the agreement and accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with postoperative pathological characteristics and stages of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Methods We recruited 527 women with EEC who underwent staging surgery at a single medical institution. The preoperative MRI, stages, and clinical and pathological parameters, including myometrial invasion (MI), cervical invasion (CI), adnexal metastasis (AM), intra‐abdominal metastasis, and pelvic and/or para‐aortic nodal metastasis, were recorded and analyzed. The agreement and accuracy between the preoperative MRI findings and these parameters and stages were assessed. Results The rate of the preoperative MRI‐based clinical stage matching the postoperative surgical stage was 85.2% in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA, 51.9% in stage IB, 35.5% in stage II, 5.3% in stage IIIA, 33.3% in stage IIIB, 28.6% in stage IIIC1, 64.3% in stage IIIC2, and 93.8% in stage IVB. The consistency between radiologists and pathologists was 80.5% for deep MI, 91.5% for cervical invasion, 92.2% for adnexal metastasis, 98.9% for intra‐abdominal metastasis, and 87.5% and 92.2% for pelvic and para‐aortic nodal metastases, respectively. The negative predictive value of intra‐abdominal metastasis was the highest with 99.8%. Conclusions Preoperative MRI could be an excellent tool for routine preoperative assessment to predict pathological parameters and stages of EEC, especially in excluding intra‐abdominal metastatic disease. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had good correlations with the pathologic parameters and stages of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Preoperative MRI had high NPVs for disease extent, particularly the extra‐uterine spread. Preoperative MRI could provide an excellent tool for routine preoperative assessment of endometrial carcinoma patients.
ISSN:2045-7634
2045-7634
DOI:10.1002/cam4.4486