Mulligan Self Mobilization Versus Mulligan Snags on Cervical Position Sense

Background: Neck pain is very common. It can negatively affect the patient's life and may result in disability.This study conducted to compare the effect of different Mulligan techniques which is more effective(Mulligan self-mobilizationorMulligan SNAGs)on cervical position sense, pain and func...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of physiotherapy 2017-04, Vol.4 (2), p.93-100
Hauptverfasser: Said, Shereen M., Ali, Olfat Ibrahim, Elazm, Shimaa Nabil Abo, Abdelraoof, Neveen Abdellatif
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Neck pain is very common. It can negatively affect the patient's life and may result in disability.This study conducted to compare the effect of different Mulligan techniques which is more effective(Mulligan self-mobilizationorMulligan SNAGs)on cervical position sense, pain and function. Methods: 87subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain, three groups were randomly assignedtoGroup(1)29 subjects received Mulligan self-mobilization and traditional treatment.Group(2)29 subjects received Mulligan SNAGs and traditional treatment. Group(3)29subjects received traditional treatment only.Position sense measured by Joint reposition error, pain measured by visual analog scale and function by Functional Neck disability index.Measurements were taken pre and post the intervention period. Results: MANOVA test revealed thatthere was significant improvement in valuesof the post-treatmentin allGroupscompared with pre-treatment of JPE (pre:P=0.725, post:P
ISSN:2349-5987
2348-8336
DOI:10.15621/ijphy/2017/v4i2/141947