‘Partly’ globalized networks and driving mechanism in resource-based state-owned enterprises: A case study of J Group
•We aim to add the “globalization” mode of enterprises with Chinese characteristics.•The scale and categories of productive investment increased, with midstream most.•The production network shows the characteristics of centralized and decentralized.•Resource, technology, environment, and enterprise...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geography and sustainability 2024-03, Vol.5 (1), p.77-88 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •We aim to add the “globalization” mode of enterprises with Chinese characteristics.•The scale and categories of productive investment increased, with midstream most.•The production network shows the characteristics of centralized and decentralized.•Resource, technology, environment, and enterprise per se influenced globalization.
In the context of economic globalization, while multinational enterprises from developed countries occupy a high-end position in the global value chain, enterprises from developing countries are often marginalized in the world market. In China, resource-based state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are tasked with the mission of safeguarding resource security, and their internationalization development ideas and strategic deployment are significantly and fundamentally different from those of other non-state-owned enterprises and large multinational corporations. This study provides ideas for the globalization policies of enterprises in developing countries. We consider J Group in western China as a case and discuss its productive investment and global production network development from 2010 to 2019. We found that J Group was ‘partly’ globalized, and there are multiple core nodes with the characteristics of centralized and decentralized coexistence in the production network; in addition, the overall layout centre shifted to Southeast Asia and China; however, its global production was restricted by the enterprise’s investment security considerations, support and restrictions of the home country, political security risk of the host country, and sanctions from the West. These findings provide insights for future research: under the wave of anti-globalization and ‘internal circulation as the main body’, resource SOEs should consider the potential risk of investment, especially keeping the middle and downstream industrial chain in China as much as possible.
[Display omitted] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2666-6839 2666-6839 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.geosus.2023.11.003 |