Child’s right to be Heard in Chilean Family Courts: Confidential Hearing

This work addresses the views family court judges have on The Right of Children to be heard (0-14 years) and the importance they give this as one of the components of the Best Interests of the Child. This qualitative study is framed into the empirical Legal Sociology. To this effect, semi structured...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista latinoamericana de derechos humanos (Heredia, Costa Rica) Costa Rica), 2016-04, Vol.26 (2), p.53-78
Hauptverfasser: Elena Salum Alvarado, Sara Salum Alvarado, Ricardo Saavedra Alvarado
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This work addresses the views family court judges have on The Right of Children to be heard (0-14 years) and the importance they give this as one of the components of the Best Interests of the Child. This qualitative study is framed into the empirical Legal Sociology. To this effect, semi structured interviews to Family Court Judges were applied, focusing on Family Courts processes, specifically in the Confidential Hearing Audience. We argue that there would be a misalignment between the legislation which aims to give life to the Convention on the Rights of the Child’s guiding principles and Family Courts, specifically, on how this legislation plans on implementing the right to be heard.
ISSN:1659-4304
2215-4221
DOI:10.15359/rldh.26-2.3