Singlino-dominated dark matter in general NMSSM

A bstract The general Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM) describes the singlino-dominated dark-matter (DM) property by four independent parameters: singlet-doublet Higgs coupling coefficient λ , Higgsino mass μ tot , DM mass m χ ˜ 1 0 , and singlet Higgs self-coupling coefficient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of high energy physics 2021-06, Vol.2021 (6), p.1-27, Article 176
Hauptverfasser: Cao, Junjie, Li, Demin, Lian, Jingwei, Yue, Yuanfang, Zhou, Haijing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A bstract The general Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM) describes the singlino-dominated dark-matter (DM) property by four independent parameters: singlet-doublet Higgs coupling coefficient λ , Higgsino mass μ tot , DM mass m χ ˜ 1 0 , and singlet Higgs self-coupling coefficient κ . The first three parameters strongly influence the DM-nucleon scattering rate, while κ usually affects the scattering only slightly. This characteristic implies that singlet-dominated particles may form a secluded DM sector. Under such a theoretical structure, the DM achieves the correct abundance by annihilating into a pair of singlet-dominated Higgs bosons by adjusting κ ’s value. Its scattering with nucleons is suppressed when λv/μ tot is small. This speculation is verified by sophisticated scanning of the theory’s parameter space with various experiment constraints considered. In addition, the Bayesian evidence of the general NMSSM and that of Z 3 -NMSSM is computed. It is found that, at the cost of introducing one additional parameter, the former is approximately 3 . 3 × 10 3 times the latter. This result corresponds to Jeffrey’s scale of 8.05 and implies that the considered experiments strongly prefer the general NMSSM to the Z 3 -NMSSM.
ISSN:1029-8479
1029-8479
DOI:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)176