Indicators for enhancing learners’ engagement in massive open online courses: A systematic review
•Interaction with the instructional materials does not guarantee engagement.•A common instrument to measure learners’ engagement should be found.•Uncommon pedagogical elements enhance learners’ engagement.•Engagement is evaluated using computer-generated data, modelling, tools, and self-reporting te...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers and education open 2022-12, Vol.3, p.100088, Article 100088 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Interaction with the instructional materials does not guarantee engagement.•A common instrument to measure learners’ engagement should be found.•Uncommon pedagogical elements enhance learners’ engagement.•Engagement is evaluated using computer-generated data, modelling, tools, and self-reporting techniques.
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have paved a new learning path for the 21st-century world. The potential to reach a massive geographically dispersed audience is one of the major advantages of MOOCs. Moreover, they can be offered on a self-paced and self-regulated basis and have become an integral part of lifelong learning, especially in workplaces. However, one persistent problem is the lack of learners’ engagement. A harmonisation of studies providing a holistic view into aggregating indicators for enhancing learners’ engagement in MOOCs is lacking. The coronavirus pandemic has accelerated MOOC adoption, and learners’ engagement in MOOCs has become even more essential for the success of this educational innovation. We examine the existing literature to derive indicators important for enhancing learners’ engagement in MOOC learning environments. Using a systematic approach, 83 empirical studies were examined, and 10 indicators were identified as important considerations for enhancing learners’ engagement while designing MOOCs—from initiatives for individual learners to platform and instructional design perspectives. We also present a table describing these indicators and offer a structured discussion on each one. We believe the results provide guidelines for MOOC designers and instructors, educational policymakers, higher education institutions, and MOOC engagement researchers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2666-5573 2666-5573 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100088 |