The possibilities of impulse oscillometry in the diagnosis of the lung function disorders after COVID-19
Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is an effort independent method of studying lung mechanics. To study the diagnostic significance of IOS in assessing lung mechanics after COVID-19. Spirometry, body plethysmography, diffusion test (DLco), IOS parameters were analyzed in 315 patients (the median age 48 year...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Terapevtic̆eskii arhiv 2023-12, Vol.95 (11), p.924-929 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; rus |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is an effort independent method of studying lung mechanics.
To study the diagnostic significance of IOS in assessing lung mechanics after COVID-19.
Spirometry, body plethysmography, diffusion test (DLco), IOS parameters were analyzed in 315 patients (the median age 48 years), the median period from the beginning of COVID-19 to the study was 50 days. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and one-dimensional logistic regression analysis with an assessment of odds ratios.
In general group, spirometry and body plethysmography parameters were in normal values, while DLCO was reduced in 61% of patients. Parameters of IOS were analyzed in the general group and between the groups, depending on the value of DLco and total lung capacity (TLC): normal or reduced. In general group, reactance area (AX), hererogeneity of resistance Rrs5-Rrs20, resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5), reactance at 5 Hz (ΔXrs5) were increased in 29.8%, 17.8%, 6%, 4.8% of patients, respectively, and were statistically significantly higher in the group with reduced TLC, whereas in the group with reduced DLco AX, Rrs5-Rrs20 were statistically significantly higher. Logistic regression analysis showed that patients with Rrs5-Rrs20>0.07 kPa×sec/l or AX>0.32 kPa/l had a 1.99-fold and 2.24-fold increased risk for decrease DLco, respectively, while the risk of decrease in TLC was 2.25-fold (p=0.012) and 3.16-fold (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0040-3660 2309-5342 |
DOI: | 10.26442/00403660.2023.11.202474 |