The Assessment of Thought Fusion Beliefs and Beliefs About Rituals: Psychometric Properties of the Thought Fusion Instrument and Beliefs About Rituals Inventory
Background: According to the metacognitive model, two domains of metacognitive beliefs play a role in the development and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The Thought Fusion Instrument (TFI) has been developed to measure metacognitive beliefs about the significance of intrusive th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological Test Adaptation and Development 2021, Vol.2 (1), p.50-61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: According to the metacognitive model, two domains
of metacognitive beliefs play a role in the development and maintenance of
obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The Thought Fusion Instrument (TFI) has
been developed to measure metacognitive beliefs about the significance of
intrusive thoughts. The Beliefs About Rituals Inventory (BARI) assesses
metacognitive beliefs about the necessity of performing ritual behaviors.
Studies assessing the psychometric properties of the TFI and BARI are scarce.
There are no studies assessing the factor structure of the TFI and the BARI.
Methods: In this study, we assessed the psychometric
properties of the TFI and the BARI in nonclinical (n =
141) and clinical populations (OCD [n = 60], anxiety
disorder [n = 30], and autism spectrum disorder
[n = 50]). In the nonclinical population, the factor
structure is also explored. Results: For both the TFI and the
BARI, an explorative factor analysis revealed a one-factor solution, which now
needs further exploration using confirmative approaches. The internal
consistency appeared good, and they had a moderate test-retest
reliability. Convergent and divergent validity of the instruments appeared
sufficient, but more research is required to draw firm conclusions. The
criterion validity turned out to be moderate for the BARI but low for the TFI in
measuring OCD-specific metacognitions. Conclusions: Based on
the explorative factor analysis, we hypothesize the TFI and the BARI to measure
a single-factor construct. The current study shows that the TFI and the BARI are
potentially suitable questionnaires to assess metacognitions in clinical and
nonclinical populations. More research is required before clear recommendations
can be made for the utility and use in clinical practice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2698-1866 2698-1866 |
DOI: | 10.1027/2698-1866/a000011 |