Physiological Correlation of Airway Pressure and Transpulmonary Pressure Stress Index on Respiratory Mechanics in Acute Respiratory Failure

Background: Stress index at post-recruitment maneuvers could be a method of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, airway pressure (P_aw) stress index may not reflect lung mechanics in the patients with high chest wall elast...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chinese medical journal 2016-07, Vol.129 (14), p.1652-1657
Hauptverfasser: Pan, Chun, Chen, Lu, Zhang, Yun-Hang, Liu, Wei, Urbino, Rosario, Ranieri, V, Qiu, Hai-Bo, Yang, Yi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Stress index at post-recruitment maneuvers could be a method of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, airway pressure (P_aw) stress index may not reflect lung mechanics in the patients with high chest wall elastance. This study was to evaluate the P stress index on lung mechanics and the correlation between P stress index and transpulmonary pressure (P_L) stress index in acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients. Methods: Twenty-four ARF patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) were consecutively recruited from July 2011 to April 2013 in Zhongda Hospital, Nanjing, China and Ospedale S. Giovanni Battista-Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy. All patients underwent MV with volume control (tidal volume 6 ml/kg) for 20 rain. PEEP was set according to the ARDSnet study protocol. The patients were divided into two groups according to the chest wall elastance/respiratory system elastance ratio. The high elastance group (H group, n = 14) had a ratio _〉30%, and the low elastance group (L group, n = 10) had a ratio 〈30%. Respiratory elastance, gas-exchange, P stress index, and Pt stress index were measured. Student's t-test, regression analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results: Pneumonia was the major cause of respiratory failure (71.0%). Compared with the L group, PEEP was lower in the H group (5.7 ± 1.7 cmH,O vs. 9.0 ± 2.3 cmH2O, P 〈 0.01 ). Compared with the H group, lung elastance was higher (20.0 ± 7.8 cmH20/L vs. 11.6 ± 3.6 cmH,O/L, P 〈 0.01), and stress was higher in the L group (7.0 ±1.9 vs. 4.9 ± 1.9, P = 0.02). A linear relationship was observed between the P stress index and the P stress index in H group (x2 = 0.56, P 〈 0.01 ) and L group (x2 = 0.85, P 〈 0.01). Conclusion: In the ARF patients with MV, P,w stress index can substitute for PL to guide ventilator settings.
ISSN:0366-6999
2542-5641
DOI:10.4103/0366-6999.185855