Improved random forest algorithms for increasing the accuracy of forest aboveground biomass estimation using Sentinel-2 imagery

•Accurately mapping forest AGB for large areas using images is challenging due to topographic complexity.•Random forest (RF) methods were compared for mapping forest AGB using Sentinel-2 images for Chuxiong.•Quantile RF coupled with the smallest mean error of each quantile led to the most accurate e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological indicators 2024-02, Vol.159, p.111752, Article 111752
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Xiaoli, Shen, Hanwen, Huang, Tianbao, Wu, Yong, Guo, Binbing, Liu, Zhi, Luo, Hongbin, Tang, Jing, Zhou, Hang, Wang, Leiguang, Xu, Weiheng, Ou, Guanglong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Accurately mapping forest AGB for large areas using images is challenging due to topographic complexity.•Random forest (RF) methods were compared for mapping forest AGB using Sentinel-2 images for Chuxiong.•Quantile RF coupled with the smallest mean error of each quantile led to the most accurate estimates.•Texture measures with windows of 3 × 3 and 5 × 5 pixels were more sensitive than other spectral variables.•Red edge 1 (B5) and Near-infrared bands derived EVIs were more sensitive than other vegetation indices. A simpler, unbiased, and comprehensive random forest (RF) model is needed to improve the accuracy of aboveground biomass (AGB) estimation. In this study, data were obtained from 128 sample plots of Pinus yunnanensis forest located in Chuxiong prefecture, Yunnan province, China. Sentinel-2 imagery data were applied to extract the important predictors of forest AGB, which were screened using the Boruta algorithm. We compared the fitting performance of two modified random forest models − regularized random forest (RRF) and quantile random forest (QRF) − with the random forest model. Moreover, we combined the smallest mean error of each quantile model as the best QRF (QRFb). The result showed: (1) Window sizes of 3 × 3 pixels and 5 × 5 pixels demonstrated greater sensitivity and suitability for estimating AGB than the 7 × 7 pixels window size. Enhanced vegetation indices derived from Red Edge 1 (B5) and Near-Infrared bands (B8A) were strongly correlated with AGB, indicating the heightened sensitivity of B5 and B8A bands to biomass and their potential in AGB estimation. (2) The RRF model outperformed both the standard RF and QRF in fitting performance, with an R2 of 0.56 and RMSE 57.14 Mg/ha. (3) The QRFb model exhibited the highest R2 of 0.88 and lowest RMSE of 29.56 Mg/ha, significantly reducing overestimation and underestimation issues. The modified RF regression supplies new insights into improving forest AGB estimation, which will be helpful for future research addressing carbon cycling.
ISSN:1470-160X
1872-7034
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111752