O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET in gliomas: influence of data processing in different centres
Background PET using O -(2-[ 18 F]fluoroethyl)- l -tyrosine ( 18 F-FET) is an established method for brain tumour diagnostics, but data processing varies in different centres. This study analyses the influence of methodological differences between two centres for tumour characterization with 18 F-FE...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | EJNMMI research 2017-08, Vol.7 (1), p.64-64, Article 64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
PET using
O
-(2-[
18
F]fluoroethyl)-
l
-tyrosine (
18
F-FET) is an established method for brain tumour diagnostics, but data processing varies in different centres. This study analyses the influence of methodological differences between two centres for tumour characterization with
18
F-FET PET using the same PET scanner.
Methodological differences between centres A and B in the evaluation of
18
F-FET PET data were identified for (1) framing of PET dynamic data, (2) data reconstruction, (3) cut-off values for tumour delineation to determine tumour-to-brain ratios (TBR) and tumour volume (T
vol
) and (4) ROI definition to determine time activity curves (TACs) in the tumour. Based on the
18
F-FET PET data of 40 patients with untreated cerebral gliomas (20 WHO grade II, 10 WHO grade III, 10 WHO grade IV), the effect of different data processing in the two centres on TBR
mean
, TBR
max
, T
vol
, time-to-peak (TTP) and slope of the TAC was compared. Further, the effect on tumour grading was evaluated by ROC analysis.
Results
Significant differences between centres A and B were found especially for TBR
max
(2.84 ± 0.99 versus 3.34 ± 1.13;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2191-219X 2191-219X |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13550-017-0316-x |