Growth, longevity and mortality of pink-shrimps Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis in southeastern Brazil

The study estimated the parameters of growth, longevity, fishing mortality (F), natural mortality (M) and total mortality (Z) and the exploitation rates (E) of the shrimps Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis sampled in Ubatuba Bay from January to December 2000. Shrimps were identified by s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine and fishery sciences (En línea) 2022-03, Vol.35 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Perroca, Julia Fernandes, Miazaki, Lizandra Fernandes, Fransozo, Adilson, Freire, Fulvio Aurelio de Moraes, Costa, Rogerio Caetano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The study estimated the parameters of growth, longevity, fishing mortality (F), natural mortality (M) and total mortality (Z) and the exploitation rates (E) of the shrimps Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis sampled in Ubatuba Bay from January to December 2000. Shrimps were identified by species, sexed and measured (carapace length – CL in mm). Overall, 1,231 individuals of F. brasiliensis and 687 of F. paulensis were analyzed. The mean size between sexes did not differ for both species. The estimated parameters of F. brasiliensis were: CL∞ = 41.08 mm, k = 2.41 year-1 for males and CL∞ = 47.32 mm, k = 2.23 year-1 for females; longevity of 1.91 years (males) and 2.05 years (females); M of 2.47 (males) and 2.28 (females); F of 7.97 (males) and 8.42 (females). For F. paulensis, the following values were observed: CL∞ = 36.55 mm, k = 2.41 year-1 for males and CL∞ = 49.24 mm, k = 2.51 year-1 for females; longevity of 1.91 years (males) and 1.81 years (females); M of 2.52 (males) and 2.52 (females); F of 7.64 (males) and 10.25 (females). The high values of k and F found for both species compared to those from the literature reflected the high E values, indicating that at the time, the closed season was still not responsible for stock recovery. We highlight the need for studies to assess the current status of stocks so they can be compared to the results found herein.
ISSN:2683-7951
2683-7951
DOI:10.47193/mafis.3522022010503