Comparison of mini-open reduction and autologous bone grafting with closed reduction and intramedullary device insertion for tibial shaft fractures: a retrospective study
We compared the clinical efficacy of mini-open reduction and autologous bone grafting (G ) and closed reduction (G ) using intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. This retrospective study included 70 tibial shaft fractures treated with G or G between January 2018 and Dece...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2023-07, Vol.18 (1), p.519-519, Article 519 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We compared the clinical efficacy of mini-open reduction and autologous bone grafting (G
) and closed reduction (G
) using intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures.
This retrospective study included 70 tibial shaft fractures treated with G
or G
between January 2018 and December 2021. The demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two treatment methods.
This study included 70 patients who were followed-up for 12.4 months. In total, 31 and 39 patients were treated with G
and G
, respectively. The operative duration was significantly shorter for G
(95.2 ± 19.3 min) than for G
(105.5 ± 22.2 min, p = 0.0454). The number of radiation times was significantly lower for G
(14.7 ± 6.3) than for G
(22.2 ± 9.2, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1749-799X 1749-799X |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13018-023-04024-9 |