Objective approach in the assessment of speech quality in patients with tongue cancer after hemiglossectomy
Introduction. Surgery is the leading treatment for tongue cancer, performance which leads to impaired speech function. Because speech is one of the most important tools of social interaction, its disorder can significantly affect patients’ quality of life. To date, there is no generally accepted obj...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Opukholi golovy i shei 2024-08, Vol.14 (2), p.65-75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; rus |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction.
Surgery is the leading treatment for tongue cancer, performance which leads to impaired speech function. Because speech is one of the most important tools of social interaction, its disorder can significantly affect patients’ quality of life. To date, there is no generally accepted objective approach to assessing the quality of speech that would make it possible to analyze speech changes at different stages of therapy and help in development of treatment strategy.
Aim. T
o compare the sound reproduction of patients with tongue cancer after hemiglossectomy with and without reconstruction using an objective assessment method, namely – a special software.
Materials and methods
. The study included 29 patients who received surgical treatment in the volume of hemiglossectomy with ipsilateral cervical lymphodissection. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the group 1 included 14 patients who underwent reconstruction with submental, radial and buccal flaps, the group 2 – 15 patients who did not underwent it. Sound reproduction by each patient was recorded before the operation, no earlier than 10–12 days after it (session of type 1) and after the end of specialized treatment: radiation therapy, chemoradiation therapy (session of type 2). If adjuvant therapy was not prescribed, the type 2 session was performed 3–6 months after surgery. The records made during sessions of the types 1 and 2 were compared with records of preoperative session. During each session, the pronunciation of 30 syllables containing 3 problematic sounds was recorded: [k], [s] and [t] (10 syllables with each of the sounds). The differences in the data obtained during the sessions types 1 and 2 were analyzed according both the syllable set and separately for each sound studied.
Results. T
he reconstruction performed improves sound pronunciation [t] after hemiglossectomy both after surgery and 3–6 months after the end of specialized treatment (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2222-1468 2411-4634 |
DOI: | 10.17650/2222-1468-2024-14-2-65-75 |