Mapping and gap analysis on antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia
Background Antimicrobial resistance is a global problem and involve pathogens which have the potential to move between food producing animals and humans by direct exposure or through the food chain or the environment. The objective of this study was to determine the performance in addressing antimic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of the National Research Centre 2023-12, Vol.47 (1), p.12-8, Article 12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Antimicrobial resistance is a global problem and involve pathogens which have the potential to move between food producing animals and humans by direct exposure or through the food chain or the environment. The objective of this study was to determine the performance in addressing antimicrobial resistance in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia. Desk review and in-depth interviews were employed for data collection. Interviews were conducted with national antimicrobial resistance focal officials.
Results
The findings indicate that in the four countries there was minimal capacity to conduct AMR surveillance. There were few well-established laboratories in tertiary hospitals, both private and public hospitals. The animal, environment and agricultural sectors in all countries had limited capacity in conducting antimicrobial resistance surveillance. There is limited data on antimicrobial resistance in all the four countries, and regional data sharing was limited. In all the four countries, data from research institutions were not linked using standardized system making difficult to compile the national database. The capacity for microbiological culture, identification and antimicrobial sensitivity testing using standardized protocols was available in the four countries. The interventions adopted by the countries included development of National Action Plans on antimicrobial resistance and setting up of multi-sectoral national coordinating structures.
Conclusions
Based on this findings, the countries need improved National Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance systems to include community settings, involving antimicrobial use and resistance in human, animal, food, and environment sectors. In addition, the region requires clear antimicrobial resistance data sharing protocol for quick comparability of the data across the region. This is important in driving antimicrobial resistance agendas at regional level, which will eventually trigger collective actions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2522-8307 2522-8307 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s42269-023-00986-2 |