Clinicopathological analysis of primary carcinoid tumour of the ovary arising in mature cystic teratomas
Objective To investigate the clinicopathological features, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of patients with primary ovarian carcinoid tumours arising in mature cystic teratomas. Methods This retrospective case series analysed the data from patients with primary ovarian carcinoid tumours arising...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of international medical research 2021-08, Vol.49 (8) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To investigate the clinicopathological features, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of patients with primary ovarian carcinoid tumours arising in mature cystic teratomas.
Methods
This retrospective case series analysed the data from patients with primary ovarian carcinoid tumours arising in mature cystic teratomas.
Results
The study enrolled four patients. Histopathological analysis of the tumours identified the following subtypes: insular (n = 1), trabecular (n = 1) and strumal (n = 2). All four primary ovarian carcinoid tumours originated from a mature teratoma. The morphology of the primary ovarian carcinoids was similar to other neuroendocrine tumours. Strumal carcinoids were composed of different proportions of thyroid tissue intimately admixed with carcinoid tumour. Tumour tissue was arranged in insular and/or trabecular patterns. The nucleus of tumour cells displayed exquisite chromatin without obvious mitotic figures. Tumour tissues were positively stained for neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A, synaptophysin and CD56 to varying degrees. Strumal carcinoid tumours were cytokeratin 19 positive and thyroid transcription factor 1 negative. No recurrence or metastasis occurred during follow-up (12–71 months).
Conclusion
Primary ovarian carcinoid tumours arising in mature cystic teratomas are rare. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis should be confirmed by clinical features, histopathological characteristics and specific immunophenotyping. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-0605 1473-2300 |
DOI: | 10.1177/03000605211034666 |