Comparison of Coxiella burnetii Excretion between Sheep and Goats Naturally Infected with One Cattle-Associated Genotype

The main reservoir of are ruminants. They shed the pathogen through birth products, vaginal mucus, faeces and milk. A direct comparison of excretions between naturally infected sheep and goats was performed on the same farm to investigate species-specific differences. The animals were vaccinated wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pathogens (Basel) 2020-08, Vol.9 (8), p.652
Hauptverfasser: Bauer, Benjamin, Prüfer, Louise, Walter, Mathias, Ganter, Isabel, Frangoulidis, Dimitrios, Runge, Martin, Ganter, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The main reservoir of are ruminants. They shed the pathogen through birth products, vaginal mucus, faeces and milk. A direct comparison of excretions between naturally infected sheep and goats was performed on the same farm to investigate species-specific differences. The animals were vaccinated with an inactivated phase I vaccine at the beginning of the study period for public health reasons. Vaginal and rectal swabs along with milk specimens were taken monthly during the lambing period and once again at the next lambing season. To estimate the environmental contamination of the animals' housings, nasal swabs from every animal were taken simultaneously. Moreover, dust samples from the windowsills and straw beddings were collected. All samples were examined by qPCR targeting the IS gene and the MLVA/VNTR typing method was performed. Whole genome sequencing was applied to determine the number of IS copies followed by a calculation of genome equivalents of each sample. The cattle-associated genotype C7 was detected containing 29 IS copies. Overall, goats seem to shed more through vaginal mucus and in particular shed more and for longer via the rectal route than sheep. This is supported by the larger quantities of DNA detected in caprine nasal swabs and environmental samples compared to the ovine ones. Transmission of from cattle to small ruminants must also be considered.
ISSN:2076-0817
2076-0817
DOI:10.3390/pathogens9080652