Short-term results of off-pump and on-pump aortic arch debranching during type I hybrid arch repair: A single-center experience
Background Compared with off-pump surgeries, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with a high systemic inflammatory response and with substantial myocardial injury, especially in high-risk subgroups. Every effort should be exerted to minimize the role of CPB without affecting the safety and ou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Medicine in Scientific Research 2022, Vol.5 (3), p.207-211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background Compared with off-pump surgeries, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with a high systemic inflammatory response and with substantial myocardial injury, especially in high-risk subgroups. Every effort should be exerted to minimize the role of CPB without affecting the safety and outcome. Classically, aortic arch surgeries were done using CPB and deep circulatory arrest together with cerebral brain protection strategies. With the development of endovascular techniques, the role of CPB decreased. Management of aortic arch pathologies carries special needs, specifically rerouting of the great vessels and preparing a landing zone. Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of off-pump aortic arch debranching during type I hybrid aortic arch repair. Patients and methods We report our single-center experience of rerouting aortic arch branches (debranching) without using CPB, consisting of bypass grafting of the aortic arch branches off pump, preparing a landing zone for endovascular aortic repair. The preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Starting from 2015, 20 low-risk patients were subjected to type I aortic arch hybrid repair, whereas the Dacron tube graft was anastomosed to a normal ascending aorta, preparing a landing zone to the subsequent stenting of arch and descending aorta. CPB was used in 10 patients, and off-pump technique was used in the remaining group. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed to compare the results. Results All surgeries went uneventful, with mean operative time of 141.5 ± 24.3 min for group I (on-pump group) and 137.5 ± 14.6 for group II (off-pump group). There were no conversions to CPB in off-pump group. There was no sternotomy for bleeding in off-pump group, compared with only one patient explored for postoperative bleeding in CPB group. All patients in both groups went without any neurological deficit of significance, with no mortality in the 30 days of follow-up. Conclusion Off-pump debranching of aortic arch followed by endovascular repair is a safe and reproducible technique, compared with the gold standard technique using CPB. However, further efforts using intraoperative cerebral perfusion monitoring techniques should be considered in the future. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2537-091X 2537-0928 |
DOI: | 10.4103/jmisr.jmisr_121_20 |