Evaluation of telemedicine for new outpatient neurological consultations
ObjectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic has broadened the use of teleneurology, how this compares with face-to-face (F2F) clinics is unclear. This study compared virtual with F2F new neurological consultations.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated new outpatient consultations in neurology clinics in Aberdeen R...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ neurology open 2022-05, Vol.4 (1), p.e000260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ObjectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic has broadened the use of teleneurology, how this compares with face-to-face (F2F) clinics is unclear. This study compared virtual with F2F new neurological consultations.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated new outpatient consultations in neurology clinics in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. We compared sociodemographic data, time to consultation, time to diagnosis, the need for reassessment and re-investigation between traditional F2F and virtual clinics using the web-based Attend Anywhere platform or telephone into patients’ own homes (or chosen location) without a trained assistant. We calculated the relative risk (RR) of the need for reassessment and re-investigation over 6-month periods by the suspected neurological diagnosis.Results73% of consultations were virtual (Attend Anywhere or telephone) between June and October 2020, this was almost non-existent ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2632-6140 2632-6140 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjno-2021-000260 |