Accuracy of Low-Cost, Smartphone-Based Retinal Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Systematic Review

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness. Early DR screening is essential, but the infrastructure can be less affordable in low resource countries. This study aims to review the accuracy of low-cost smartphone-based fundus cameras for DR screening in adult patients with diabetes. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) N.Z.), 2023-01, Vol.17, p.2459-2470
Hauptverfasser: Prayogo, Mohammad Eko, Zaharo, Alfia Fatma, Damayanti, Novandriati Nur Rizky, Widyaputri, Felicia, Thobari, Jarir At, Susanti, Vina Yanti, Sasongko, Muhammad Bayu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness. Early DR screening is essential, but the infrastructure can be less affordable in low resource countries. This study aims to review the accuracy of low-cost smartphone-based fundus cameras for DR screening in adult patients with diabetes. We performed a systematic literature search to find studies that reported the sensitivity and specificity of low-cost smartphone-based devices for fundus photography in adult patients with diabetes. We searched three databases (MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Scopus) and one register (Cochrane CENTRAL). We presented the accuracy values by grouping the diagnosis into three: any DR, referrable DR, and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Risk of bias and applicability of the studies were assessed using QUADAS-2. Five out of 294 retrieved records were included with a total of six smartphone-based devices reviewed. All of the reference diagnostic methods used in the included studies were either indirect ophthalmoscopy or slit-lamp examinations and all smartphone-based devices' imaging protocols used mydriatic drops. The reported sensitivity and specificity for any DR were 52-92.2% and 73.3-99%; for referral DR were 21-91.4% and 64.9-100%; and for DMO were 29.4-81% and 95-100%, respectively. Sensitivity available low-cost smartphone-based devices for DR screening were acceptable and their specificity particularly for detecting referrable DR and DMO were considerably good. These findings support their potential utilization for DR screening in a low resources setting.
ISSN:1177-5467
1177-5483
1177-5483
DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S416422