A Meta-analysis on Vitamin D Deficiency in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

Vitamin D Deficiency (VDD) is reported to be more frequent with serious clinical outcomes in patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD). There is a wide disparity in data in the existing literature regarding the prevalence and risk of VDD in patients with SCD. These data require further summary and ana...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib medical journal 2020, Vol.2 (3), p.95-100
Hauptverfasser: Mohamed, Sagad Omer Obeid, MohamedElmugadam, Fatima Abdelhakam Abdellatif, Awadalla, Hiba Faroug Mohamed, Mohamedali, Abdalla Omer Obeid, Alawad, Mansour Osman Alhaj, Noureddin, Ahmed Abdulgadir, Osman, Afnan Abugundul Ahmed, Mohamed, Esraa Mohamed Osman, Ibrahim, Gehad Abdelmonem Abdalla, Elsayed, Malaz Ahmed Osman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Vitamin D Deficiency (VDD) is reported to be more frequent with serious clinical outcomes in patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD). There is a wide disparity in data in the existing literature regarding the prevalence and risk of VDD in patients with SCD. These data require further summary and analyses for better accuracy. This review aimed to assess the association between VDD and SCD, and was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline/ PubMed, World Health Organization Virtual Health Library Science Direct, and Google Scholar were used for the systematic search. A random effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence, Risk Ratio (RR), and Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) estimates with the corresponding 95% Confidence Interval (CI) using Open Meta Analyst software version 10.10 (Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA). Twenty-five studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The prevalence of VDD among patients with SCD was 63.8% (95% CI, 52.5–75.1). The risk of VDD among patients with SCD was more than two times that of the general population (RR = 2.129; 95% CI, 1.024–4.423; p < 0.001). Serum vitamin D levels were significantly lower in SCD patients than in their controls (SMD = −1.883: 95% CI, −3.006 to −0.760; p < 0.001). This review provides a comprehensive view of the association between vitamin D status and SCD.
ISSN:2666-819X
2590-3349
2590-3349
DOI:10.2991/dsahmj.k.200717.001