Seismic performance of buckling‐restrained brace outrigger system in various configurations
The outrigger system is deemed an effective solution for mitigating the seismic responses of tall core‐tube‐type buildings. By incorporating a buckling‐restrained brace (BRB) in the outrigger system (BRB‐outrigger), the BRB‐outrigger reduces seismic response not only through the outrigger mechanism...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Japan architectural review 2019-10, Vol.2 (4), p.392-408 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The outrigger system is deemed an effective solution for mitigating the seismic responses of tall core‐tube‐type buildings. By incorporating a buckling‐restrained brace (BRB) in the outrigger system (BRB‐outrigger), the BRB‐outrigger reduces seismic response not only through the outrigger mechanism but also through the seismic energy dissipation from the BRB’s hysteretic response. This study investigates the seismic behavior of structures with a single layer BRB‐outrigger and proposes three types of BRB‐outrigger configurations for practical design purposes that fit different architectural requirements. An analytical model, with heights of 64, 128, 256, and 384 m and different outrigger spans was used to investigate the optimal outrigger elevation and required outrigger stiffness for achieving minimum seismic response using spectral analysis and nonlinear response history analysis. The design indexes and design charts based on the analysis results are proposed for preliminary design. Design examples of structures with different BRB‐outrigger configurations utilizing the proposed design charts are demonstrated.
This research investigated the optimal design for structures with damped‐outrigger incorporating BRB. Three different configurations of BRB‐outrigger were introduced in detail. The seismic performances of the structures with different BRB‐outrigger configurations were compared. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2475-8876 2475-8876 |
DOI: | 10.1002/2475-8876.12120 |